Aftereffect of high-speed motion

Publication date

1998-12-01

Authors

Verstraten, Frans A JISNI 0000000033767671
van der Smagt, M.J.ORCID 0000-0003-2772-6429ISNI 0000000390366905
van de Grind, W. A.ISNI 0000000066646454

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

DOI

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

A visual illusion known as the motion aftereffect is considered to be the perceptual manifestation of motion sensors that are recovering from adaptation. This aftereffect can be obtained for a specific range of adaptation speeds with its magnitude generally peaking for speeds around 3 deg s-1. The classic motion aftereffect is usually measured with a static test pattern. Here, we measured the magnitude of the motion aftereffect for a large range of velocities covering also higher speeds, using both static and dynamic test patterns. The results suggest that at least two (sub)populations of motion-sensitive neurons underlie these motion aftereffects. One population shows itself under static test conditions and is dominant for low adaptation speeds, and the other is prevalent under dynamic test conditions after adaptation to high speeds. The dynamic motion aftereffect can be perceived for adaptation speeds up to three times as fast as the static motion aftereffect. We tested predictions that follow from the hypothesised division in neuronal substrates. We found that for exactly the same adaptation conditions (oppositely directed transparent motion with different speeds), the aftereffect direction differs by 180 ° depending on the test pattern. The motion aftereffect is opposite to the pattern moving at low speed when the test pattern is static, and opposite to the high-speed pattern for a dynamic test pattern. The determining factor is the combination of adaptation speed and type of test pattern.

Keywords

Taverne, General Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citation

Verstraten, F A J, Van Der Smagt, M J & Van De Grind, W A 1998, 'Aftereffect of high-speed motion', Perception, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1055-1066.