Analyzing mechanisms of action of antimicrobial peptides on bacterial membranes requires multiple complimentary assays and different bacterial strains

Publication date

2023-08

Authors

Wang, XiaoqiISNI 0000000492963057
van Beekveld, Roy A MISNI 0000000512624467
Xu, YangISNI 000000049296296X
Parmar, Anish
Das, Sanjit
Singh, Ishwar
Breukink, EefjanISNI 0000000392861563

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) commonly target bacterial membranes and show broad-spectrum activity against microorganisms. In this research we used three AMPs (nisin, epilancin 15×, [R4L10]-teixobactin) and tested their membrane effects towards three strains (Staphylococcus simulans, Micrococcus flavus, Bacillus megaterium) in relation with their antibacterial activity. We describe fluorescence and luminescence-based assays to measure effects on membrane potential, intracellular pH, membrane permeabilization and intracellular ATP levels. The results show that our control peptide, nisin, performed mostly as expected in view of its targeted pore-forming activity, with fast killing kinetics that coincided with severe membrane permeabilization in all three strains. However, the mechanisms of action of both Epilancin 15× as well as [R4L10]-teixobactin appeared to depend strongly on the bacterium tested. In certain specific combinations of assay, peptide and bacterium, deviations from the general picture were observed. This was even the case for nisin, indicating the importance of using multiple assays and bacteria for mode of action studies to be able to draw proper conclusions on the mode of action of AMPs.

Keywords

Antimicrobial peptides, Membrane effects, Membrane potential, pH homeostasis, ATP homeostasis

Citation

Wang, X, van Beekveld, R A M, Xu, Y, Parmar, A, Das, S, Singh, I & Breukink, E 2023, 'Analyzing mechanisms of action of antimicrobial peptides on bacterial membranes requires multiple complimentary assays and different bacterial strains', Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Biomembranes, vol. 1865, no. 6, 184160, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2023.184160