Detection of fetal chromosomal anomalies: Does nuchal translucency measurement have added value in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing?

Publication date

2015-01-01

Authors

Lichtenbelt, KlaskeORCID 0000-0002-6370-9207ISNI 0000000390426699
Diemel, B. D M
Koster, M.P.H. (Wendy)ISNI 0000000389255351
Manten, Gwendolyn T RISNI 0000000396584268
Siljee, J.
Schuring-Blom, G. H.
Christiaens, G. C.M.LieveISNI 0000000389494379

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to determine what percentage of fetal chromosomal anomalies remains undetected when first trimester combined testing is replaced by non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomies 13, 18, and 21. We focused on the added clinical value of nuchal translucency (NT) measurement. METHODS: Data on fetal karyotype, ultrasound findings, and pregnancy outcome of all pregnancies with an NT measurement ≥3.5 mm were retrospectively collected from a cohort of 25,057 singleton pregnancies in which first trimester combined testing was performed. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-five fetuses (0.9 %) had an NT ≥3.5 mm. In 24 of these pregnancies, a chromosomal anomaly other than trisomy 13, 18, or 21 was detected. Eleven resulted in fetal demise, and ten showed fetal ultrasound anomalies. In three fetuses with normal ultrasound findings, a chromosomal anomaly was detected, of which one was a triple X. CONCLUSIONS: In three out of 25,057 pregnancies (0.01%), non-invasive prenatal testing and fetal ultrasound would have missed a chromosomal anomaly that would have been identified by NT measurement.

Keywords

Taverne, Genetics(clinical), Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Evaluation Studies, Journal Article

Citation

Lichtenbelt, K D, Diemel, B D M, Koster, M P H, Manten, G T R, Siljee, J, Schuring-Blom, G H & Page-Christiaens, G C M L 2015, 'Detection of fetal chromosomal anomalies : Does nuchal translucency measurement have added value in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing?', Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 663-668. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4589