Risk factors for antimicrobial use in Dutch pig farms: A cross-sectional study

Publication date

2024-07

Authors

Mallioris, P.ISNI 0000000506826003
Luiken, RoosmarijnISNI 0000000492481592
Tobias, TijsORCID 0000-0002-0747-9531ISNI 0000000419470010
Vonk, John
Wagenaar, JaapISNI 0000000388430808
Stegeman, ArjanORCID 0000-0003-4361-3846ISNI 0000000388528223
Mughini-Gras, LapoISNI 0000000492913113

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial use (AMU) has decreased significantly in Dutch pig farms since 2009. However, this decrease has stagnated recently, with relatively high AMU levels persisting mainly among weaners. The aim of this study was to identify farm-level characteristics associated with: i) total AMU and ii) use of specific antimicrobial classes. METHODS: In 2020, cross-sectional data from 154 Dutch pig farms were collected, including information on AMU and farm characteristics. A mixed-effects conditional Random Forest analysis was applied to select the subset of features that was best associated with AMU. RESULTS: The main risk factors for total AMU in weaners were vaccination for PRRS in sucklings, being a conventional farm (vs. not), high within-farm density, and early weaning. The main protective factors for total AMU in sows/sucklings were E. coli vaccination in sows and having boars for estrus detection from own production. Regarding antimicrobial class-specific outcomes, several risk factors overlapped for weaners and sows/sucklings, such as farmer's non-tertiary education, not having free-sow systems during lactation, and conventional farming. An additional risk factor for weaners was having fully slatted floors. For fatteners, the main risk factor for total AMU was PRRS vaccination in sucklings. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors found here to be associated with AMU. Some were known but others were novel, such as farmer's tertiary education, low pig aggression and free-sow systems which were all associated with lower AMU. These factors provide targets for developing tailor-made interventions, as well as an evidence-based selection of features for further causal assessment and mediation analysis.

Keywords

Animal welfare, Antibiotics, Biosecurity, Random Forest, Swine, Weaners, General Veterinary, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being

Citation

Mallioris, P, Luiken, R E C, Tobias, T, Vonk, J, Wagenaar, J A, Stegeman, A & Mughini-Gras, L 2024, 'Risk factors for antimicrobial use in Dutch pig farms : A cross-sectional study', Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 174, 105307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105307