Mixed Methods in Emerging Academic Subdisciplines: The Case of Sport Management

Publication date

2015-01-01

Authors

van der Roest, Jan-WillemORCID 0000-0003-0684-9710ISNI 0000000393021961
Spaaij, RamonISNI 0000000037845470
van Bottenburg, MaartenORCID 0000-0001-5764-2459ISNI 0000000081842314

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

This article examines the prevalence and characteristics of mixed methods research in the relatively new subdiscipline of sport management. A mixed methods study is undertaken to evaluate the epistemological/philosophical, methodological, and technical levels of mixed methods design in sport management research. The results indicate that mixed methods research is still rarely used, poorly legitimized and often weakly designed in this field. Our conclusions lead to the hypotheses that the more central a research field is, the higher the prevalence of mixed methods, and that mixed methods only slowly trickle down from central to more peripheral subdisciplines. Implications of the research findings for both mixed methods scholars and sport management researchers are discussed, and directions for future research are proposed.

Keywords

design, mixed methods research, paradigms, prevalence rates, sport management, Taverne, Social Sciences (miscellaneous), Education, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Citation

van der Roest, J W, Spaaij, R & van Bottenburg, M 2015, 'Mixed Methods in Emerging Academic Subdisciplines : The Case of Sport Management', Journal of Mixed Methods Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 70-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813508225