A review of NMF, PLSA, LBA, EMA, and LCA with a focus on the identifiability issue

Publication date

2025-12-25

Authors

Qi, QianqianISNI 0000000524688337
van der Heijden, PeterISNI 0000000067738801

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/workingpaper/preprint
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Across fields such as machine learning, social science, geography, considerable attention has been given to models that factorize a nonnegative matrix into the product of two or three matrices, subject to nonnegative or row-sum-to-1 constraints. Although these models are to a large extend similar or even equivalent, they are presented under different names, and their similarity is not well known. This paper highlights similarities among five popular models, latent budget analysis (LBA), latent class analysis (LCA), end-member analysis (EMA), probabilistic latent semantic analysis (PLSA), and nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF). We focus on an essential issue-identifiability-of these models and prove that the solution of LBA, EMA, LCA, PLSA is unique if and only if the solution of NMF is unique. We also provide a brief review for algorithms of these models. We illustrate the models with a time budget dataset from social science, and end the paper with a discussion of closely related models such as archetypal analysis.

Keywords

SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production

Citation

Qi, Q & Van der Heijden, P G M 2025 'A review of NMF, PLSA, LBA, EMA, and LCA with a focus on the identifiability issue' arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.22282