A review of NMF, PLSA, LBA, EMA, and LCA with a focus on the identifiability issue
Publication date
2025-12-25
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/workingpaper/preprint
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
Across fields such as machine learning, social science, geography, considerable attention has been given to models that factorize a nonnegative matrix into the product of two or three matrices, subject to nonnegative or row-sum-to-1 constraints. Although these models are to a large extend similar or even equivalent, they are presented under different names, and their similarity is not well known. This paper highlights similarities among five popular models, latent budget analysis (LBA), latent class analysis (LCA), end-member analysis (EMA), probabilistic latent semantic analysis (PLSA), and nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF). We focus on an essential issue-identifiability-of these models and prove that the solution of LBA, EMA, LCA, PLSA is unique if and only if the solution of NMF is unique. We also provide a brief review for algorithms of these models. We illustrate the models with a time budget dataset from social science, and end the paper with a discussion of closely related models such as archetypal analysis.
Keywords
SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
Citation
Qi, Q & Van der Heijden, P G M 2025 'A review of NMF, PLSA, LBA, EMA, and LCA with a focus on the identifiability issue' arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.22282