Value of audits in breast cancer screening quality assurance programmes

Abstract

Our aim was to retrospectively evaluate the results of all audits performed in the past and to assess their value in the quality assurance of the Dutch breast cancer screening programme. The audit team of the Dutch Reference Centre for Screening (LRCB) conducts triennial audits of all 17 reading units. During audits, screening outcomes like recall rates and detection rates are assessed and a radiological review is performed. This study investigates and compares the results of four audit series: 1996-2000, 2001-2005, 2003-2007 and 2010-2013. The analysis shows increased recall rates (from 0.66 %, 1.07 %, 1.22 % to 1.58 %), increased detection rates (from 3.3, 4.5, 4.8 to 5.4 per 1000) and increased sensitivity (from 64.5 %, 68.7 %, 70.5 % to 71.6 %), over the four audit series. The percentage of 'missed cancers' among interval cancers and advanced screen-detected cancers did not change (p = 0.4). Our audits not only provide an opportunity for assessing screening outcomes, but also provide moments of self-reflection with peers. For radiologists, an accurate understanding of their performance is essential to identify points of improvement. We therefore recommend a radiological review of screening examinations and immediate feedback as part of an audit. aEuro cent Radiological review and immediate feedback are recommended as part of an audit. aEuro cent For breast screening radiologists, audits provide moments of self-reflection with peers. aEuro cent Radiological review of screening examinations provides insights in recall behaviour. aEuro cent Accurate understanding of radiologists' performance is essential to identify points of improvement.