Simulation-based evaluation of SAR and flip angle homogeneity for five transmit head arrays at 14 T
Publication date
2023-04
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Various research sites are pursuing 14 T MRI systems. However, both local SAR and RF transmit field inhomogeneity will increase. The aim of this simulation study is to investigate the trade-offs between peak local SAR and flip angle uniformity for five transmit coil array designs at 14 T in comparison to 7 T. METHODS: Investigated coil array designs are: 8 dipole antennas (8D), 16 dipole antennas (16D), 8 loop coils (8D), 16 loop coils (16L), 8 dipoles/8 loop coils (8D8L) and for reference 8 dipoles at 7 T. Both RF shimming and k T-points were investigated by plotting L-curves of peak SAR levels vs flip angle homogeneity. RESULTS: For RF shimming, the 16L array performs best. For k T-points, superior flip angle homogeneity is achieved at the expense of more power deposition, and the dipole arrays outperform the loop coil arrays. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: For most arrays and regular imaging, the constraint on head SAR is reached before constraints on peak local SAR are violated. Furthermore, the different drive vectors in k T-points alleviate strong peaks in local SAR. Flip angle inhomogeneity can be alleviated by k T-points at the expense of larger power deposition. For k T-points, the dipole arrays seem to outperform loop coil arrays.
Keywords
Computer Simulation, Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods, Phantoms, Imaging, Radio Waves, 14T, Simulation study, Flip angle homogeneity, SAR assesment, Coil designs, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Biophysics, Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Journal Article
Citation
Harrevelt, S D, Roos, T H M, Klomp, D W J, Steensma, B R & Raaijmakers, A J E 2023, 'Simulation-based evaluation of SAR and flip angle homogeneity for five transmit head arrays at 14 T', Magma - Magnetic Resonance Materials In Physics Biology And Medicine, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 245-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-023-01067-1