Is the SMART risk prediction model ready for real-world implementation?: A validation study in a routine care setting of approximately 380 000 individuals

Publication date

2022-03

Authors

McKay, Ailsa J
Gunn, Laura H
Ference, Brian A
Dorresteijn, Jannick A NORCID 0000-0002-0190-8526ISNI 0000000419437536
Berkelmans, Gijs H K
Visseren, Frank L.J.ISNI 0000000389493675
Ray, Kausik K

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc

Abstract

AIMS: Reliably quantifying event rates in secondary prevention could aid clinical decision-making, including quantifying potential risk reductions of novel, and sometimes expensive, add-on therapies. We aimed to assess whether the SMART risk prediction model performs well in a real-world setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a historical open cohort study using UK primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (2000-2017) diagnosed with coronary, cerebrovascular, peripheral, and/or aortic atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Analyses were undertaken separately for cohorts with established (≥6 months) vs. newly diagnosed ASCVD. The outcome was first post-cohort entry occurrence of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death. Among the cohort with established ASCVD [n = 244 578, 62.1% male, median age 67.3 years, interquartile range (IQR) 59.2-74.0], the calibration and discrimination achieved by the SMART model was not dissimilar to performance at internal validation [Harrell's c-statistic = 0.639, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.636-0.642, compared with 0.675, 0.642-0.708]. Decision curve analysis indicated that the model outperformed treat all and treat none strategies in the clinically relevant 20-60% predicted risk range. Consistent findings were observed in sensitivity analyses, including complete case analysis (n = 182 482; c = 0.624, 95% CI 0.620-0.627). Among the cohort with newly diagnosed ASCVD (n = 136 445; 61.0% male; median age 66.0 years, IQR 57.7-73.2), model performance was weaker with more exaggerated risk under-prediction and a c-statistic of 0.559, 95% CI 0.556-0.562. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the SMART model in this validation cohort demonstrates its potential utility in routine healthcare settings in guiding both population and individual-level decision-making for secondary prevention patients.

Keywords

Cardiovascular disease, Risk calculator, Risk prediction, Secondary prevention, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, Journal Article

Citation

McKay, A J, Gunn, L H, Ference, B A, Dorresteijn, J A N, Berkelmans, G F N, Visseren, F L J & Ray, K K 2022, 'Is the SMART risk prediction model ready for real-world implementation? A validation study in a routine care setting of approximately 380 000 individuals', European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 654-663. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwab093