Quality assurance and the need to evaluate interventions and audit programme outcomes

Publication date

2017-06

Authors

Zhao, Min
Vaartjes, IloncaORCID 0000-0002-9951-5164ISNI 0000000392724702
Klipstein-Grobusch, KerstinORCID 0000-0002-5462-9889ISNI 0000000016414268
Kotseva, Kornelia
Jennings, Catriona
Grobbee, RickORCID 0000-0003-4472-4468ISNI 0000000030206553
Graham, Ian

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Evidence-based clinical guidelines provide standards for the provision of healthcare. However, these guidelines have been poorly implemented in daily practice. Clinical audit is a quality improvement tool to promote quality of care in daily practice and to improve outcomes through the systematic review of care delivery and implementation of changes. A major priority in the management of subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD) management is secondary prevention by controlling cardiovascular risk factors and providing appropriate medical treatment. Clinical audits can be applied to monitor modifiable risk factors and evaluate quality improvements of CVD management in daily practice. Existing clinical audits have provided an overview of the burden of risk factors in subjects with CVD and reflect real-world risk factor recording and management.

Keywords

Audit, Cardiovascular disease, Quality assessment, Secondary prevention, Taverne, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology

Citation

Zhao, M, Vaartjes, I, Klipstein-Grobusch, K, Kotseva, K, Jennings, C, Grobbee, D E & Graham, I 2017, 'Quality assurance and the need to evaluate interventions and audit programme outcomes', European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 123-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487317703829