Uncoordinated, contradictory, yet cumulatively effective: how four critiques of the humanities study of religion inflict collateral damage on the scientific study of religion
Publication date
2026
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Editorial
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
Keywords
Taverne, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Religious studies
Citation
Wildman, W J, Ross, R M, McKay, R T, Sosis, R, Watts, J, Shaver, J H, Price, M E, Cristofori, I & Hoogeveen, S 2026, 'Uncoordinated, contradictory, yet cumulatively effective : how four critiques of the humanities study of religion inflict collateral damage on the scientific study of religion', Religion, Brain and Behavior, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2026.2630498