A Silk Road for Professional Qualifications?: EU Models of Integration and their Potential in Sino–EU Relations

Publication date

2020-11

Authors

van den Brink, A.ISNI 0000000078699983
de Vries, SybeORCID 0000-0002-7939-3585ISNI 000000008002466X

Editors

van der Wende, Marijk
Kirby, William C
Liu, Nian Cai
Marginson, Simon

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Part of book
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

The tension between the public interest to regulate professions, and the economic rationales to open up markets has long since been an issue within the EU. This has resulted in a variety of regulatory models to accommodate the interests and values at stake. Such models differ in terms of not only their impact on national autonomy, but also their effectiveness in actually achieving access to markets in other EU Member States. In this Chapter, we explore how these competing interests have shaped the EU’s legal frameworks for the recognition of professional qualifications. We will see that a range of regulatory strategies have been applied to design such frameworks. The next element of our analysis is based on the assumption that we may be able to draw lessons from the EU’s internal regulatory strategies to deal with national differences in regulating professions. Thus, we will examine to what extent, and under which circumstances, such regulatory strategies may offer viable perspectives for Sino-EU relations; a crucially important question considering the implications of the New Silk Road for higher education on the trade of goods and services between China and Europe.

Keywords

mutual recognition, professional qualifications, shared values, integration, harmonization, public/private arrangements, mutual trust, Taverne

Citation

van den Brink, A & de Vries, S A 2020, A Silk Road for Professional Qualifications? EU Models of Integration and their Potential in Sino–EU Relations. in M van der Wende, W C Kirby, N C Liu & S Marginson (eds), China and Europe on the New Silk Road: Connecting Universities Across Eurasia. Oxford University Press, pp. 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198853022.003.0011