What makes the psychosis 'clinical high risk' state risky: psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder?
Publication date
2021-07-06
Authors
Hasmi, Laila
Pries, Lotta-Katrin
Ten Have, Margreet
de Graaf, Ron
van Dorsselaer, Saskia
Bak, Maarten
Kenis, Gunter
Richards, Alexander
Lin, Bochao Danae
O'Donovan, Michael C
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
AIMS: Although attenuated psychotic symptoms in the psychosis clinical high-risk state (CHR-P) almost always occur in the context of a non-psychotic disorder (NPD), NPD is considered an undesired 'comorbidity' epiphenomenon rather than an integral part of CHR-P itself. Prospective work, however, indicates that much more of the clinical psychosis incidence is attributable to prior mood and drug use disorders than to psychosis clinical high-risk states per se. In order to examine this conundrum, we analysed to what degree the 'risk' in CHR-P is indexed by co-present NPD rather than attenuated psychosis per se. METHODS: We examined the incidence of early psychotic experiences (PE) with and without NPD (mood disorders, anxiety disorders, alcohol/drug use disorders), in a prospective general population cohort (n = 6123 at risk of incident PE at baseline). Four interview waves were conducted between 2007 and 2018 (NEMESIS-2). The incidence of PE, alone (PE-only) or with NPD (PE + NPD) was calculated, as were differential associations with schizophrenia polygenic risk score (PRS-Sz), environmental, demographical, clinical and cognitive factors. RESULTS: The incidence of PE + NPD (0.37%) was lower than the incidence of PE-only (1.04%), representing around a third of the total yearly incidence of PE. Incident PE + NPD was, in comparison with PE-only, differentially characterised by poor functioning, environmental risks, PRS-Sz, positive family history, prescription of antipsychotic medication and (mental) health service use. CONCLUSIONS: The risk in 'clinical high risk' states is mediated not by attenuated psychosis per se but specifically the combination of attenuated psychosis and NPD. CHR-P/APS research should be reconceptualised from a focus on attenuated psychotic symptoms with exclusion of non-psychotic DSM-disorders, as the 'pure' representation of a supposedly homotypic psychosis risk state, towards a focus on poor-outcome NPDs, characterised by a degree of psychosis admixture, on the pathway to psychotic disorder outcomes.
Keywords
Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Mood Disorders, Prospective Studies, Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology, Schizophrenia/epidemiology, risk, Epidemiology, prevention, psychosis, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health, Epidemiology, Journal Article
Citation
Hasmi, L, Pries, L-K, Ten Have, M, de Graaf, R, van Dorsselaer, S, Bak, M, Kenis, G, Richards, A, Lin, B D, O'Donovan, M C, Luykx, J J, Rutten, B P F, Guloksuz, S & van Os, J 2021, 'What makes the psychosis 'clinical high risk' state risky : psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder?', Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, vol. 30, e53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S204579602100041X