First arrival and owning the land: How children reason about ownership of territory

Publication date

2015-03-01

Authors

Verkuyten, MaykelORCID 0000-0003-0137-1527ISNI 0000000114807698
Sierksma, JellieORCID 0000-0002-1690-5811ISNI 0000000419538505
Thijs, JochemISNI 0000000396146065

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Two experiments provide evidence that children (9-12 years) infer ownership of a physical place from first arrival. In experiment 1, children (. N=284) indicated that a character owns the land more and has more ownership right than another character when arriving first compared with arriving at the same time. In the second experiment (. N=551) it was found that first arrivers who work the land are perceived to own the land more than those who do not work the land. Yet, the importance of investment for inferring ownership was not so strong to fully undermine the first arriver principle. Additionally, when the first arriving character intended to abandon the land she was considered to own the land less than when she had the intention to return. However, information about abandonment intention also was not relevant enough to fully undermine the possessory right of the first arriver.

Keywords

Children, First arrival, Ownership, Territoriality, Taverne, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology

Citation

Verkuijten, M, Sierksma, J & Thijs, J 2015, 'First arrival and owning the land : How children reason about ownership of territory', Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 41, pp. 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.007