Return to work after mild-to-moderate stroke: work satisfaction and predictive factors

Publication date

2019

Authors

van der Kemp, Jet
Kruithof, Willeke J.
Nijboer, TanjaISNI 0000000390969706
van Bennekom, Coen A. M.
van Heugten, Caroline
Visser-Meily, Johanna M. A.

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

A large proportion of stroke patients are unable to return to work (RTW), although figures vary greatly. A total of 121 mild-to-moderate stroke patients, who had a paid job at the time of their stroke were included (a) to quantify RTW and work satisfaction one-year post-stroke (using the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation) and (b) to determine factors predicting RTW post-stroke, based on stroke-related, personal and neuropsychological variables. Half of the patients were not in work (28%) or were working less (22%) than pre-stroke. Ninety percent of those in fulltime employment post-stroke were satisfied with their occupational situation, against 36% of the unemployed participants. In regards to factors predicting RTW, global cognitive functioning (r = .19, Montreal Cognitive Assessment) and depressive symptoms (r = −.16, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) at two months post-stroke onset were associated with return to work within one year. Only global cognitive functioning was an independent predictor of RTW (11.3% variance, p = .013). Although the explained variance was not that high, neuropsychological factors probably play a pivotal role in returning to work and should be taken into account during rehabilitation after mild and moderate stroke.

Keywords

cognition, predictive factors, Return to work, stroke, work satisfaction, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Rehabilitation, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Applied Psychology

Citation

van der Kemp, J, Kruithof, W J, Nijboer, T C W, van Bennekom, C A M, van Heugten, C & Visser-Meily, J M A 2019, 'Return to work after mild-to-moderate stroke : work satisfaction and predictive factors', Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 638-653. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2017.1313746