Characterizing void ratio and compressibility of Holocene peat with CPT for assessing coastal-deltaic subsidence

Publication date

2018-05-01

Authors

Koster, KayISNI 0000000442736446
Lange, Ger De
Harting, Ronald
de Heer, Eppie
Middelkoop, H.ORCID 0000-0002-9549-292XISNI 0000000114994315

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Cone penetration testing (CPT) was used to determine the void ratio and compressibility of Holocene peat present in the coastal-deltaic plain of the Netherlands, to explore its application for mapping the subsidence potential of this low-lying area. CPT sounds the mechanical behaviour of subsurface layers when penetrated with a cone, and is the most widely used site investigation method in the Netherlands. In this study 41 peat layers in the coastal-deltaic plainwere sounded, and subsequently cored for determination of peat type, organic matter content, degree of decomposition and void ratio. The results revealed that cone resistance depends on the void ratio of the peat layer. The compression parameters coefficient of volume compressibility (mv) and compression index (Cc) were derived from this. The results further revealed that the compressibility of the peat increases with increasing organic matter content. It is concluded that for mapping the susceptibility of the coastal-deltaic plain to future subsidence by peat compression, CPT has the potential to become a useful tool, as thousands of CPTs are conducted in the Netherlands each year, and their logged measurements are stored in a freely accessible national database.

Keywords

Taverne, Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology, Geology, Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)

Citation

Koster, K, Lange, G D, Harting, R, de Heer, E & Middelkoop, H 2018, 'Characterizing void ratio and compressibility of Holocene peat with CPT for assessing coastal-deltaic subsidence', Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 210-218. https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2017-120