Climate change impacts of bioenergy technologies: A comparative consequential LCA of sustainable fuels production with CCUS

Publication date

2024-08-25

Authors

Krogh, Andreas
Junginger, H.M.ORCID 0000-0002-5010-2051ISNI 0000000389848632
Shen, LiORCID 0000-0001-9378-7372ISNI 0000000419419098
Grue, Jeppe
Pedersen, Thomas H.

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc_nd

Abstract

The use of sustainable biomass can be a cost-effective way of reducing the greenhouse gas emissions in the maritime and aviation sectors. Biomass, however, is a limited resource, and therefore, it is important to use the biomass where it creates the highest value, not only economically, but also in terms of GHG reductions. This study comprehensively evaluates the GHG reduction potential of utilising forestry residue in different bioenergy technologies using a consequential LCA approach. Unlike previous studies that assess GHG impacts per unit of fuel produced, this research takes a feedstock-centric approach which enables comparisons across systems that yield diverse products and by-products. Three technologies—combined heat and power plant with carbon capture, hydrothermal liquefaction, and gasification—are assessed, while considering both carbon capture and storage (CCS) or carbon capture and utilisation (CCU). Through scenario analysis, the study addresses uncertainty, and assumptions in the LCA modelling. It explores the impact of energy systems, fuel substitution efficiency, renewable energy expansion, and the up/down stream supply chain. All technology pathways showed a potential for net emissions savings when including avoided emissions from substitution of products, with results varying from −111 to −1742 kgCO2eq per tonne residue. When combining the bioenergy technologies with CCU the dependency on the energy system in which they are operated was a significantly higher compared to CCS. The breakpoint was found to be 44 kg CO2eq/kWh electricity meaning that the marginal electricity mix has to be below this point for CCU to obtain lower GHG emissions. Furthermore, it is evident that the environmental performance of CCU technologies is highly sensitive to how it will affect the ongoing expansion of renewable electricity capacity.

Keywords

Biocrude, Bioenergy, CCS, CCU, Life cycle assessment, Methanol, Environmental Engineering, Environmental Chemistry, Waste Management and Disposal, Pollution, SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy, SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production, SDG 13 - Climate Action, SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth, SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure, SDG 15 - Life on Land

Citation

Krogh, A, Junginger, M, Shen, L, Grue, J & Pedersen, T H 2024, 'Climate change impacts of bioenergy technologies : A comparative consequential LCA of sustainable fuels production with CCUS', Science of the Total Environment, vol. 940, 173660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173660