The beauty versus the beast: On the motives of engaged and workaholic employees

Publication date

2014-07-17

Authors

Taris, T.W.ORCID 0000-0003-1946-3307ISNI 0000000042649423
van Beek, I.ISNI 0000000419439160
Schaufeli, WilmarORCID 0000-0002-6070-7150ISNI 0000000081817266

Editors

Snir, R.
Harpaz, I.

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Part of book
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

This chapter focuses on two types of heavy work investment: work engagement and workaholism. A body of research has addressed the conceptualization and consequences of these concepts. M. Peiperl and B. Jones stated that workaholic employees are hard workers who fi nd their work enjoyable and get a lot out of it. Y. Baruch argued that not only is workaholism linked to high productivity, but also that workaholic employees may function as role models to other employees in competitive environments. The most infl uential scholars sharing this view have been Janet Spence and Ann Robbins, who proposed the so-calledworkaholic triad. Basically, they argue that workaholism should be conceived as a threedimensional concept, involving work involvement, drive, and work enjoyment. Interestingly, the description of the typical work enthusiast strongly resembles that of the work engaged employee.

Keywords

Taverne

Citation

Taris, T W, van Beek, I & Schaufeli, W B 2014, The beauty versus the beast: On the motives of engaged and workaholic employees. in R Snir & I Harpaz (eds), Heavy work investment: Its nature, sources, outcomes, and future directions. Series in applied psychology, Routledge, New York, pp. 121-139. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203380987-8