Insulin-like 3 affects zebrafish spermatogenic cells directly and via Sertoli cells

Publication date

2021-02-15

Authors

Crespo Morao, DiegoISNI 0000000505985352
de Castro Assis, Luiz HenriqueISNI 0000000518036770
Zhang, Yu Ting
Safian Carrillo, D.A.ISNI 0000000419577483
Furmanek, Tomasz
Skaftnesmo, Kai Ove
Norberg, Birgitta
Ge, Wei
Choi, Yung-Ching
Den broeder, Marjo J.ISNI 0000000389603950

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Pituitary hormones can use local signaling molecules to regulate target tissue functions. In adult zebrafish testes, follicle-stimulating hormone (Fsh) strongly increases the production of insulin-like 3 (Insl3), a Leydig cell-derived growth factor found in all vertebrates. Little information is available regarding Insl3 function in adult spermatogenesis. The Insl3 receptors Rxfp2a and 2b were expressed by type A spermatogonia and Sertoli and myoid cells, respectively, in zebrafish testis tissue. Loss of insl3 increased germ cell apoptosis in males starting at 9 months of age, but spermatogenesis appeared normal in fully fertile, younger adults. Insl3 changed the expression of 409 testicular genes. Among others, retinoic acid (RA) signaling was up- and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (Pparg) signaling was down-regulated. Follow-up studies showed that RA and Pparg signaling mediated Insl3 effects, resulting in the increased production of differentiating spermatogonia. This suggests that Insl3 recruits two locally active nuclear receptor pathways to implement pituitary (Fsh) stimulation of spermatogenesis.

Keywords

General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Medicine (miscellaneous), General Medicine

Citation

Crespo, D, Assis, L H C, Zhang, Y T, Safian, D, Furmanek, T, Skaftnesmo, K O, Norberg, B, Ge, W, Choi, Y-C, den Broeder, M J, Legler, J, Bogerd, J & Schulz, R W 2021, 'Insulin-like 3 affects zebrafish spermatogenic cells directly and via Sertoli cells', Communications Biology, vol. 4, no. 1, 204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-01708-y