Chronic Q Fever Diagnosis-Consensus Guideline versus Expert Opinion

Publication date

2015-07

Authors

Kampschreur, L. M.
Wegdam-Blans, Marjolijn C. A.
Weyer, Peter C.
Renders, Nicole H. M.
Delsing, Corine E.
Sprong, Tom
van Kasteren, Marjo E. E.
BijImer, Henk
Notermans, Daan
Oosterheert, Jan JelrikISNI 0000000390278892

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Chronic Q fever, caused by Coxiella burnetii, has high mortality and morbidity rates if left untreated. Controversy about the diagnosis of this complex disease has emerged recently. We applied the guideline from the Dutch Q Fever Consensus Group and a set of diagnostic criteria proposed by Didier Raoult to all 284 chronic Q fever patients included in the Dutch National Chronic Q Fever Database during 2006-2012. Of the patients who had proven cases of chronic Q fever by the Dutch guideline, 46 (30.5%) would not have received a diagnosis by the alternative criteria designed by Raoult, and 14 (4.9%) would have been considered to have possible chronic Q fever. Six patients with proven chronic Q fever died of related causes. Until results from future studies are available, by which current guidelines can be modified, we believe that the Dutch literature-based consensus guideline is more sensitive and easier to use in clinical practice.

Keywords

ENDOCARDITIS, INFECTIONS, CRITERIA

Citation

Kampschreur, L M, Wegdam-Blans, M C A, Weyer, P C, Renders, N H M, Delsing, C E, Sprong, T, van Kasteren, M E E, BijImer, H, Notermans, D, Oosterheert, J J, Stals, F S, Nabuurs-Franssen, M H, Bleeker-Rovers, C P & Dutch Q Fever Consensus Grp 2015, 'Chronic Q Fever Diagnosis-Consensus Guideline versus Expert Opinion', Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1183-1188. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2107.130955