The evolution of female social relationships in nonhuman primates
Files
Publication date
1997-07-20
Authors
Sterck, E.H.M.
Watts, David P.
Schaik, C.P. van
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
Considerable interspecifc variation in female
social relationships occurs in gregarious primates, par-
ticularly with regard to agonism and cooperation be-
tween females and to the quality of female relationships
with males. This variation exists alongside variation in
female philopatry and dispersal. Socioecological theories
have tried to explain variation in female-female social
relationships from an evolutionary perspective focused
on ecological factors, notably predation and food dis-
tribution. According to the current ``ecological model'',
predation risk forces females of most diurnal primate
species to live in groups; the strength of the contest
component of competition for resources within and be-
tween groups then largely determines social relationships
between females. Social relationships among gregarious
females are here characterized as Dispersal-Egalitarian,
Resident-Nepotistic, Resident-Nepotistic-Tolerant, or
Resident-Egalitarian. This ecological model has suc-
cessfully explained differences in the occurrence of for-
mal submission signals, decided dominance relation-
ships, coalitions and female philopatry. Group size and
female rank generally affect female reproduction success
as the model predicts, and studies of closely related
species in different ecological circumstances underscore
the importance of the model. Some cases, however, can
only be explained when we extend the model to incor-
porate the effects of infanticide risk and habitat satura-
tion. We review evidence in support of the ecological
model and test the power of alternative models that in-
voke between-group competition, forced female phi-
lopatry, demographic female recruitment, male inter-
ventions into female aggression, and male harassment.
Not one of these models can replace the ecological
model, which already encompasses the between-group
competition. Currently the best model, which explains
several phenomena that the ecological model does not, is
a ``socioecological model'' based on the combined im-
portance of ecological factors, habitat saturation and
infanticide avoidance. We note some points of similarity
and divergence with other mammalian taxa; these re-
main to be explored in detail.
Keywords
Primate social organization, Competition, Infanticide, Habitat saturation