Nerve ultrasound: A reproducible diagnostic tool in peripheral neuropathy
Publication date
2019-01-29
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
Objective To determine interobserver variability of nerve ultrasound in peripheral neuropathy in a prospective, systematic, multicenter study. Methods We enrolled 20 patients with an acquired chronic demyelinating or axonal polyneuropathy and 10 healthy controls in 3 different centers. All participants underwent an extensive nerve ultrasound protocol, including cross-sectional area measurements of median, ulnar, fibular, tibial, and sural nerves, and brachial plexus. Real-time image acquisition was performed blind by a local and a visiting investigator (reference). Five patients were investigated using different types of sonographic devices. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated, and a random-effects model was fitted to identify factors with significant effect on interobserver variability. Results Systematic differences between measurements made by different investigators were small (mean difference 0.11 mm2 [95% confidence interval 0.00-0.23 mm2]). Intraclass correlation coefficients were generally higher in arm nerves (0.48-0.96) than leg nerves (0.46-0.61). The hospital site and sonographic device did not contribute significantly to interobserver variability in the random-effects model. Conclusions Interobserver variability of nerve ultrasound in peripheral neuropathy is generally limited, especially in arm nerves. Different devices and a multicenter setting have no effect on interobserver variability. Therefore, nerve ultrasound is a reproducible tool for diagnostics in routine clinical practice and (multicenter) research.
Keywords
Taverne, Clinical Neurology
Citation
Telleman, J A, Herraets, I J T, Goedee, H S, Verhamme, C, Nikolakopoulos, S, Van Asseldonk, J T H, Van Der Pol, W L, Van Den Berg, L H & Visser, L H 2019, 'Nerve ultrasound : A reproducible diagnostic tool in peripheral neuropathy', Neurology, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. E443-E450. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006856