Enemas, suppositories and rectal stimulation are not effective in accelerating enteral feeding or meconium evacuation in low-birthweight infants: a systematic review

Publication date

2016-11

Authors

Kamphorst, Kim
Sietsma, Ydelette
Brouwer, A. J.ISNI 0000000392595031
Rood, Paul J T
van den Hoogen, AgnesISNI 0000000395590957

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Early full enteral feeding in preterm infants decreases morbidity and mortality. Our systematic review covered the effectiveness of rectal stimulation, suppositories and enemas on stooling patterns and feeding tolerance in low-birthweight infants born at up to 32 weeks. It comprised seven studies published between 2007 and 2014 and covered 495 infants. CONCLUSION: Suppositories were ineffective in shortening the time to reach full enteral feeding, and the evidence on enemas was contradictory. Enemas and rectal stimulation did not shorten the time until complete meconium evacuation was reached. Further research into safe, effective interventions to accelerate meconium excretion is needed.

Keywords

Enemas, Feeding tolerance, Low-birthweight infants, Meconium excretion, Suppositories, Taverne, Journal Article, Review

Citation

Kamphorst, K, Sietsma, Y, Brouwer, A J, Rood, P J T & van den Hoogen, A 2016, 'Enemas, suppositories and rectal stimulation are not effective in accelerating enteral feeding or meconium evacuation in low-birthweight infants : a systematic review', Acta Paediatrica, vol. 105, no. 11, pp. 1280-1287. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13540