Treating benign ureteroenteric strictures: 27-year experience comparing endourological techniques with open surgical approach

Abstract

Purpose: To compare open surgical anastomotic revision with endourological techniques for the treatment of ureteroenteric strictures in patients with urinary diversions. Methods: All records of patients treated for ureteroenteric strictures in our clinic between 1989 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. In 76 patients, 161 completed procedures were analyzed: 26 open revisions vs. 135 endourological treatments, including balloon dilation, Wallstent and/or laser vaporization. Results: Median follow-up was 34 months. At 60 months, patency rates were 69% (95% CI 52–92%) after open vs. 27% (95% CI 19–39%) after endo-treatment (p = 0.003); median patency duration was 15.5 vs. 5 months, respectively (p = 0.014). Eventually, 15% of patients required open surgery after primary endo-treatment and 21% received endoscopic re-treatment after primary open surgery. Cox regression analysis revealed no confounding factors among the risk factors added to the model. Complication rates were higher after open surgery (27% Clavien 2, 12% Clavien 3–4 vs. 5% Clavien 1–2, 3% Clavien 3, p = 0.528). Median postoperative hospital stay was 14 days (open) vs. 2 days (endo), p < 0.001. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate improved with + 17 (open) vs. + 8.1 (endo), p = 0.024. Renal function was compromised in 8% of patients in the open surgery group vs. 6% in the endo-treatment group. Conclusions: In these patients, in terms of patency and patency duration, open surgery was superior to endourology. Nevertheless, endourological treatments offer a safe and less-invasive alternative to delay or avoid open surgery, especially in patients who are unfit for open surgery.