Less Bang for Your Buck?: How Social Capital Constrains the Effectiveness of Social Welfare Spending
Publication date
2018-09
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
Rising economic insecurity in recent decades has focused attention on the importance of social welfare programs in managing household financial stability. Some governments are more effective than others in managing this outcome, and informal social institutions help explain why. Social capital is expected to shape economic security through multiple mechanisms, but whether the effect is to magnify or mitigate volatility is an open question. Part of the answer has to do with how social capital interacts with policy implementation, and whether it conditions the effectiveness of government spending. Evidence from the U.S. states from 1986 to 2010 fails to support a benevolent social capital thesis—not only is social capital associated with greater economic insecurity, there is no evidence that it improves social welfare effectiveness. However, greater spending on some social programs can mitigate the adverse impact of social capital on economic security.
Keywords
Taverne, SDG 1 - No Poverty, SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
Citation
Compton, M E 2018, 'Less Bang for Your Buck? How Social Capital Constrains the Effectiveness of Social Welfare Spending', State Politics & Policy Quarterly, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 215-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440018775424