The role of transit accessibility in influencing the activity space and non-work activity participation of different income groups
Publication date
2022-07-13
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by_nc_nd
Abstract
Improved accessibility by transit service constitutes a critical component in removing spatial barriers in daily mobility for disadvantaged groups. However, the effects of transit accessibility on the daily mobility and activity participation of different social strata remain inconclusive. This study investigates the role of transit accessibility on the activity space of three income groups in Hong Kong. The results show that the availability of transit stations and network accessibility by mass transit rail (MTR) are significantly linked to the spatial extensiveness of activity space of the higher-and medium-income commuters, while bus plays a more important role for the daily mobility of the low-income group. Concerning non-work activity participation, the low-income non-commuters appear less affected by the availability of MTR stations than the other two groups, suggesting a potentially lower ability of using MTR to carry out different daily activities. Our findings offer some in-depth insights into the possible social inequality of using transit service, thereby contributing to a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between transit accessibility and mobility in relation to economic status. Policy recommendations to alleviate transport disadvantage and improve social equity are proposed.
Keywords
activity participation, activity space, income, social equity, Transit accessibility, Geography, Planning and Development, Transportation, Urban Studies, SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities, SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
Citation
Tao, S, He, S Y, Ettema, D & Luo, S 2022, 'The role of transit accessibility in influencing the activity space and non-work activity participation of different income groups', Journal of Transport and Land Use, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 375-398. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2022.2075