Lung Mean Dose Prediction in Transarterial Radioembolization (TARE): Superiority of [ 166Ho]-Scout Over [ 99mTc]MAA in a Prospective Cohort Study

Publication date

2024-04

Authors

Wagemans, Martijn E H M
Braat, Arthur J.A.T.ORCID 0000-0002-8824-8697
van Rooij, RobISNI 000000039182607X
Smits, Maarten L.J.ORCID 0000-0003-4735-655XISNI 0000000419580500
Bruijnen, Rutger C.G.
Prince, Jip F
Bol, Guus M.ORCID 0000-0002-4021-3823ISNI 0000000419580578
de Jong, Hugo W.A.M.ORCID 0000-0002-3000-8316
Lam, Marnix G.E.H.ORCID 0000-0002-4902-9790

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Purpose: Radiation pneumonitis is a serious complication of radioembolization. In holmium-166 ([166Ho]) radioembolization, the lung mean dose (LMD) can be estimated (eLMD) using a scout dose with either technetium-99 m-macroaggregated albumin ([99mTc]MAA) or [166Ho]-microspheres. The accuracy of eLMD based on [99mTc]MAA (eLMDMAA) was compared to eLMD based on [166Ho]-scout dose (eLMDHo-scout) in two prospective clinical studies. Materials and Methods: Patients were included if they received both scout doses ([99mTc]MAA and [166Ho]-scout), had a posttreatment [166Ho]-SPECT/CT (gold standard) and were scanned on the same hybrid SPECT/CT system. The correlation between eLMDMAA/eLMDHo-scout and LMDHo-treatment was assessed by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (r). Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to analyze paired data. Results: Thirty-seven patients with unresectable liver metastases were included. During follow-up, none developed symptoms of radiation pneumonitis. Median eLMDMAA (1.53 Gy, range 0.09–21.33 Gy) was significantly higher than median LMDHo-treatment (0.00 Gy, range 0.00–1.20 Gy; p < 0.01). Median eLMDHo-scout (median 0.00 Gy, range 0.00–1.21 Gy) was not significantly different compared to LMDHo-treatment (p > 0.05). In all cases, eLMDMAA was higher than LMDHo-treatment (p < 0.01). While a significant correlation was found between eLMDHo-scout and LMDHo-treatment (r = 0.43, p < 0.01), there was no correlation between eLMDMAA and LMDHo-treatment (r = 0.02, p = 0.90). Conclusion: [166Ho]-scout dose is superior in predicting LMD over [99mTc]MAA, in [166Ho]-radioembolization. Consequently, [166Ho]-scout may limit unnecessary patient exclusions and avoid unnecessary therapeutic activity reductions in patients eligible for radioembolization. Trail registration: NCT01031784, registered December 2009. NCT01612325, registered June 2012. Graphical Abstract: (Figure presented.)

Keywords

Holmium-166, Lung mean dose, Radiation pneumonitis, Radioembolization, SPECT/CT, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Journal Article

Citation

Wagemans, M E H M, Braat, A J A T, van Rooij, R, Smits, M L J, Bruijnen, R C G, Prince, J F, Bol, G M, de Jong, H W A M & Lam, M G E H 2024, 'Lung Mean Dose Prediction in Transarterial Radioembolization (TARE): Superiority of [ 166Ho]-Scout Over [ 99mTc]MAA in a Prospective Cohort Study', Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 443-450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-023-03656-y