Dilemmas of involvement in land management - Comparing an active (Dutch) and a passive (German) approach
Publication date
2015-01-01
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
What is the role of spatial planners in urban development? Planners can be very involved in the realization of the land-use plans or they can take a more passive role in development processes. Which role they take depends on the particular institutional arrangements for land management in each country. In this contribution, a typical active and a typical passive approach to land management are compared in order to shed lights on the effects in terms of land management. Therefore the Dutch active land policy and German mandatory land readjustment are taken as an example of each type of approach. Not the whole system of land management, but the approaches (i.e. inherent notions and values) in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, democratic legitimacy and the underlying concept of fairness are related to each other. By studying the differences among these fundamental aspects, this contribution attempts to reconsider planning by law and property rights in terms of the relation between planning instruments and their particular context.
Keywords
Active land policy, Land management, Land readjustment, Planning law, Taverne, Forestry, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Geography, Planning and Development, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, SDG 15 - Life on Land
Citation
Hartmann, T & Spit, T 2015, 'Dilemmas of involvement in land management - Comparing an active (Dutch) and a passive (German) approach', Land Use Policy, vol. 42, pp. 729-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.004