Three-dimensional density model of the Upper Mantle in the Middle East: Interaction of diverse tectonic processes
Files
Publication date
2016-07
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
We present a three-dimensional density model of the lithosphere and upper mantle for the Middle East and surroundings based on seismic, gravity, and seismic tomography data and analyze the main factors responsible for the density variations. The gravity effect of the crust is calculated and removed from the observed field using the most recent crustal model. The residual gravity anomalies are jointly inverted with the residual topography to image the density distribution within the upper mantle. The inversion is constrained by an initial density model based on seismic tomography. The obtained density variations span in a large range (±60 kg/m3), revealing strong asymmetry in the density structure of the Arabian plate. The uppermost mantle layer in the Arabian Shield is relatively dense. However, below a depth of ~100 km we observe a strong low-density anomaly. In contrast, the mantle density in the Arabian platform increases at the same depths. The most pronounced decrease of the mantle density occurs in the Gulf of Aden, Red Sea, and East African Rift. Underneath the northern Red Sea the low-density anomaly is limited to the depth ~150 km, while in the southern part it is likely linked to a mantle plume. The densest mantle material is found under the South Caspian basin, which is likely associated with an eclogite body in the uppermost mantle. In the collision zones (the Zagros Belt and the Hellenic Arc), the high-density lithosphere shows the location of the subducting plates.
Keywords
Taverne
Citation
Kaban, M, El Khrepy , S, Al-Arifi, N, Tesauro, M & Stolk, W 2016, 'Three-dimensional density model of the Upper Mantle in the Middle East : Interaction of diverse tectonic processes', Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, vol. 121, no. 7, pp. 5349-5364. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012755