Motor, affective and cognitive empathy in adolescence: Interrelations between facial electromyography and self-reported trait and state measures

Publication date

2016

Authors

Van der Graaff, JolienISNI 0000000397134349
Meeus, Wim H JISNI 0000000034127027
de Wied, MinetISNI 0000000393153809
van Boxtel, Anton
van Lier, Pol A C
Koot, Hans M.
Branje, SusanORCID 0000-0002-9999-5313ISNI 0000000112866969

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

This study examined interrelations of trait and state empathy in an adolescent sample. Self-reported affective trait empathy and cognitive trait empathy were assessed during a home visit. During a test session at the university, motor empathy (facial electromyography), and self-reported affective and cognitive state empathy were assessed in response to empathy-inducing film clips portraying happiness and sadness. Adolescents who responded with stronger motor empathy consistently reported higher affective state empathy. Adolescents' motor empathy was also positively related to cognitive state empathy, either directly or indirectly via affective state empathy. Whereas trait empathy was consistently, but modestly, related to state empathy with sadness, for state empathy with happiness few trait–state associations were found. Together, the findings provide support for the notion that empathy is a multi-faceted phenomenon. Motor, affective and cognitive empathy seem to be related processes, each playing a different role in the ability to understand and share others' feelings.

Keywords

Emotion, Facial EMG, Motor mimicry, State empathy, Trait empathy, Taverne, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citation

Van der Graaff, J, Meeus, W, de Wied, M, van Boxtel, A, van Lier, P A C, Koot, H M & Branje, S 2016, 'Motor, affective and cognitive empathy in adolescence : Interrelations between facial electromyography and self-reported trait and state measures', Cognition & Emotion, vol. 30, pp. 745-761. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1027665