Influence of heart rate on coronary calcium scores: a multi-manufacturer phantom study

Publication date

2018-06

Authors

van Der Werf, Niels
Willemink, Martin
Willems, Tineke P.
Vliegenthart, R.
Greuter, Marcel J W
Leiner, TimORCID 0000-0003-1885-5499ISNI 0000000390698205

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

Abstract

To evaluate the influence of heart rate on coronary calcium scores (CCS) using a dynamic phantom on four high-end computed tomography (CT) systems from different manufacturers. Artificial coronary arteries were moved in an anthropomorphic chest phantom at linear velocities, corresponding to < 60, 60–75 and > 75 beats per minute (bpm). Data was acquired with routinely used clinical protocols for CCS on four high-end CT systems (CT1–CT4). CCS, quantified as Agatston and mass scores were compared to reference scores at < 60 bpm. Influence of heart rate was assessed for each system with the cardiac motion susceptibility (CMS) Index. At increased heart rates (> 75 bpm), Agatston scores of the low mass calcification were similar to the reference score, while Agatston scores of the medium and high mass calcification increased significantly up to 50% for all CT systems. Threefold CMS increases at > 75 bpm in comparison with < 60 bpm were shown. For medium and high mass calcifications, significant differences in CMS between CT systems were found. Heart rate substantially influences CCS for high-end CT systems of four major manufacturers, but CT systems differ in motion susceptibility. Follow-up CCS CT scans should be acquired on the same CT system and protocol, and preferably with comparable heart rates.

Keywords

Agatston score, Computed tomography, Coronary calcium, Heart rate, Mass score, Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Citation

van der Werf, N R, Willemink, M J, Willems, T P, Vliegenthart, R, Greuter, M J W & Leiner, T 2018, 'Influence of heart rate on coronary calcium scores : a multi-manufacturer phantom study', The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 959-966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1293-x