Subsidiarity Ex Ante and Ex Post: From the Early Warning System to the Court of Justice of the European Union

Publication date

2024-05

Authors

Huysmans, M.ORCID 0000-0002-8431-1396ISNI 0000000492896237
van den Brink, A.ISNI 0000000078699983
van Gruisen, Philippe

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

The subsidiarity principle divides competences between the European Union and its Member States. The Lisbon Treaty suggests a connection between ex ante and ex post subsidiarity review. Ex ante, national parliaments were given a role via the early warning system (EWS). Ex post, legislation is subject to review by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). More than 10 years after Lisbon, this article is the first to theorize and evaluate whether there is indeed a connection. Our theory predicts a conditional connection. Quantitatively, we provide a two-way classification of Member States based on their use of the EWS and CJEU subsidiarity cases. Qualitatively, we look back from court cases to the Council stage and analyse the Advocate General's opinions in subsidiarity cases. We find a weak conditional connection. A key explanation appears to be the Court's limited willingness to enforce subsidiarity and hence the limited incentives to go to court.

Keywords

European Court of Justice, early warning system, judicial review, subsidiarity, Economics and Econometrics, General Business,Management and Accounting, Political Science and International Relations, Business and International Management

Citation

Huysmans, M, van den Brink, T & van Gruisen, P 2024, 'Subsidiarity Ex Ante and Ex Post : From the Early Warning System to the Court of Justice of the European Union', Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 744-759. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13531