Vigilance in wild Thomas's langurs (Presbytis thomasi): the importance of infanticide risk
Files
Publication date
1998-09-06
Authors
Steenbeek, Romy
Piek, R.C. (Ruben)
Buul, M. (Marleen) van
Hooft, J.A.R.A.M. (Jan) van
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
This study examines vigilance as a behavioural
indicator of the importance of infanticide risk by com-
paring the infanticide avoidance hypothesis with the
predation avoidance and mate defence hypotheses for
wild Thomas's langurs (Presbytis thomasi) in Sumatra.
We found that all individuals were more vigilant in sit-
uations of high predation risk, i.e. lower in the trees and
in the absence of neighbours. Females were also more
vigilant on the periphery of the group. However, there
were variations in vigilance levels that could not be ac-
counted for by the predation avoidance hypothesis.
Males without infants showed higher levels of vigilance
in areas of home range overlap than in non-overlap ar-
eas during the early phase of their tenure, strongly
suggesting mate defence. In these areas of home range
overlap where Thomas's langur groups can interact,
males may attack females and infants, and so the in-
fanticide risk for males and females with infants is likely
to be high in these areas. Only females with infants, but
not males with infants or females without infants,
showed higher vigilance levels in overlap areas than in
non-overlap areas; in addition, in overlap areas, females
with an infant were more vigilant than females without
an infant, while this was not the case in non-overlap
areas. Both females and males with infants were more
vigilant high in the trees than at medium heights in
overlap areas but not elsewhere. These findings can only
be explained by the infanticide avoidance hypothesis. In
contrast to predator attacks, infanticidal male attacks
come from high in the canopy, and only occur in overlap
areas. There was a significant sex difference in vigilance,
but males were only more vigilant than females without
an infant, and not more vigilant than females with an
infant. We conclude that vigilance varied mainly in re-
lation to the risk of predation and infanticide. Mate
competition only played a role for males during the early
phase of their tenure. Predation risk seems to offer the
best explanation for vigilance for all individuals in the
absence of infants. Both predation risk and infanticide
risk played a role for females and males with infants.
Keywords
Vigilance, Predation, Mate defence, Infanticide, Thomas's langurs, Presbytis thomasi