Estimating the impact of COVID-19 self-test availability and modifications in test-strategy on overall test uptake using an experimental vignette study

Publication date

2024-03-11

Authors

Zomer, Colene L.
Kroese, FISNI 0000000394582218
Sanders, Jet G.
Janssen, Riny
de Bruin, Marijn

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

To inform future Dutch COVID-19 testing policies we did an experimental vignette study to investigate whether inclusion of the less reliable lateral flow tests (self-tests) would change test-uptake sufficiently to improve population-level test sensitivity. A representative sample (n = 3,270) participated in a 2-by-2 online experiment to evaluate the effects of test-guidelines including self-testing advice (IV1), and the effects of self-test availability (IV2) on expected test uptake (PCR test, self-test or no test) and sensitivity of the overall test strategy (primary outcome). Across four scenarios, changing test advice did not affect expected testing behaviour. Self-test availability, however, increased the timeliness of testing, the number of people testing, and overall test strategy sensitivity. Based on these findings, we recommend that (national) policy facilitates a supply of self-tests at home, for example through free and pro-active distribution of test-kits during a pandemic. This could substantially enhance the chances of timely detecting and isolating patients.

Keywords

General

Citation

Zomer, C L, Kroese, F, Sanders, J G, Janssen, R & de Bruin, M 2024, 'Estimating the impact of COVID-19 self-test availability and modifications in test-strategy on overall test uptake using an experimental vignette study', Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, 5887. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54988-9