Predicting the mechanical hip–knee–ankle angle accurately from standard knee radiographs: a cross-validation experiment in 100 patients

Publication date

2020-12

Authors

Gielis, Willem Paul
Rayegan, Hassan
Arbabi, VahidORCID 0000-0003-3347-2891ISNI 0000000419547591
Ahmadi Brooghani, Seyed Y.
Lindner, Claudia
Cootes, Tim F.
de Jong, Pim AORCID 0000-0003-4840-6854ISNI 0000000395539334
Weinans, HarrieORCID 0000-0002-2275-6170ISNI 0000000393288658
Custers, Roel

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Background and purpose — Being able to predict the hip–knee–ankle angle (HKAA) from standard knee radiographs allows studies on malalignment in cohorts lacking full-limb radiography. We aimed to develop an automated image analysis pipeline to measure the femoro-tibial angle (FTA) from standard knee radiographs and test various FTA definitions to predict the HKAA. Patients and methods — We included 110 pairs of standard knee and full-limb radiographs. Automatic search algorithms found anatomic landmarks on standard knee radiographs. Based on these landmarks, the FTA was automatically calculated according to 9 different definitions (6 described in the literature and 3 newly developed). Pearson and intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC]) were determined between the FTA and HKAA as measured on full-limb radiographs. Subsequently, the top 4 FTA definitions were used to predict the HKAA in a 5-fold cross-validation setting. Results — Across all pairs of images, the Pearson correlations between FTA and HKAA ranged between 0.83 and 0.90. The ICC values from 0.83 to 0.90. In the cross-validation experiments to predict the HKAA, these values decreased only minimally. The mean absolute error for the best method to predict the HKAA from standard knee radiographs was 1.8° (SD 1.3). Interpretation — We showed that the HKAA can be automatically predicted from standard knee radiographs with fair accuracy and high correlation compared with the true HKAA. Therefore, this method enables research of the relationship between malalignment and knee pathology in large (epidemiological) studies lacking full-limb radiography.

Keywords

Algorithms, Anatomic Landmarks/diagnostic imaging, Ankle/pathology, Bone Malalignment/diagnosis, Dimensional Measurement Accuracy, Extremities/diagnostic imaging, Female, Hip/pathology, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods, Knee/diagnostic imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Predictive Value of Tests, Radiography/methods, Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Journal Article

Citation

Gielis, W P, Rayegan, H, Arbabi, V, Ahmadi Brooghani, S Y, Lindner, C, Cootes, T F, de Jong, P A, Weinans, H & Custers, R J H 2020, 'Predicting the mechanical hip–knee–ankle angle accurately from standard knee radiographs : a cross-validation experiment in 100 patients', Acta Orthopaedica, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 732-737. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1779516