Fault zone fabric and fault weakness
Publication date
2009
Authors
Collettini, C.
Niemeijer, A.
Viti, C.
Marone, C.
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
(c) UU Universiteit Utrecht, 2009
Abstract
Geological and geophysical evidence suggests that some crustal
faults are weak1–6 compared to laboratory measurements of frictional
strength7. Explanations for fault weakness include the presence
of weak minerals4, high fluid pressures within the fault core8,9
and dynamic processes such as normal stress reduction10, acoustic
fluidization11 or extreme weakening at high slip velocity12–14.
Dynamic weakening mechanisms can explain some observations;
however, creep and aseismic slip are thought to occur on weak
faults, and quasi-static weakening mechanisms are required to
initiate frictional slip on mis-oriented faults, at high angles to
the tectonic stress field. Moreover, the maintenance of high fluid
pressures requires specialized conditions15 and weak mineral
phases are not present in sufficient abundance to satisfy weak fault
models16, so weak faults remain largely unexplained. Here we provide
laboratory evidence for a brittle, frictional weakening mechanism
based on common fault zone fabrics. We report on the
frictional strength of intact fault rocks sheared in their in situ
geometry. Samples with well-developed foliation are extremely
weak compared to their powdered equivalents. Micro- and nanostructural
studies show that frictional sliding occurs along very
fine-grained foliations composed of phyllosilicates (talc and
smectite). When the same rocks are powdered, frictional strength
is high, consistent with cataclastic processes. Our data show that
fault weakness can occur in cases where weak mineral phases constitute
only a small percentage of the total fault rock and that low
friction results from slip on a network of weak phyllosilicate-rich
surfaces that define the rock fabric. The widespread documentation
of foliated fault rocks along mature faults in different tectonic
settings and from many different protoliths4,17–19 suggests that this
mechanism could be a viable explanation for fault weakening in
the brittle crust.