Institutions and diversification: Related versus unrelated diversification in a varieties of capitalism framework

Publication date

2015-12-01

Authors

Boschma, RonISNI 0000000116353431
Capone, GianlucaISNI 0000000429594113

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

The varieties of capitalism literature has drawn little attention to industrial renewal and diversification, while the related diversification literature has neglected the institutional dimension of industrial change. Bringing together both literatures, the paper proposes that institutions have an impact on the direction of the diversification process, in particular on whether countries gain a comparative advantage in new sectors that are close or far from what is already part of their existing industrial structure. We investigate the diversification process in 23 developed countries by means of detailed product trade data in the period 1995-2010. Our results show that relatedness is a stronger driver of diversification into new products in coordinated market economies, while liberal market economies show a higher probability to move in more unrelated industries: their overarching institutional framework gives countries more freedom to make a jump in their industrial evolution. In particular, we found that the role of relatedness as driver of diversification into new sectors is stronger in the presence of institutions that focus more on 'non-market' coordination in the domains of labor relations, corporate governance relations, product market relations, and inter-firm relations.

Keywords

Diversification, Evolutionary economic geography, Institutions, Relatedness, Varieties of capitalism, Taverne, General Engineering, Strategy and Management, Management Science and Operations Research, Management of Technology and Innovation, SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth

Citation

Boschma, R & Capone, G 2015, 'Institutions and diversification : Related versus unrelated diversification in a varieties of capitalism framework', Research Policy, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1902-1914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.013