Acute toxicity and quality of life after margin reduction using a sub-fractionation workflow for stereotactic radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer on a 1.5 Tesla MR-linac

Publication date

2025-06

Authors

Lalmahomed, Tariq AORCID 0000-0002-9007-5713
Willigenburg, Thomas
van de Pol, S M G
de Groot-van Breugel, E N
Snoeren, L M W
Hes, J
van Melick, HHE
Verkooijen, Helena MORCID 0000-0001-9480-1623
de Boer, Johannes C J
van der Voort van Zyp, Jochem R NISNI 0000000393775683

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A sub-fractionation workflow to correct for intrafraction motion in localized prostate cancer radiotherapy was implemented at our center, allowing for PTV margin reduction from isotropic 5 mm to 2 mm in cranio-caudal and left-right directions and 3 mm in the anterior-posterior direction. The purpose of this study was to assess differences in acute toxicity before and after margin reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Included patients were treated with 36.25 Gy in five fractions on a 1.5 T MR-linac, with PTV margins of 5 mm (standard margins) or 2-3 mm (tight margins). The primary endpoint was acute (90 days post-RT) toxicity. Physician-reported toxicity was measured by maximum CTCAE version 5.0 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) scores. Patient reported toxicity was a secondary endpoint, assessed through EPIC-26 urinary and bowel domain scores. Groups were balanced through propensity score matching after multiple imputation using chained equations. Pearson's Chi-squared tests were used to analyze CTCAE scores and Wilcoxon rank sum tests to analyze EPIC-26 scores. RESULTS: 299 eligible patients were identified (193 and 106 in the tight and standard margin groups, respectively). After matching, 212 patients (106 per treatment group) were available for assessment. No statistically significant between-group differences in physician-reported toxicity were observed at any follow-up point. Patient-reported urinary irritative/obstructive quality of life was statistically, but not clinically, significantly higher after one month. Overall, scores declined during treatment and one month post-RT, but returned to baseline levels three months post-RT. CONCLUSION: Margin reduction below 5 mm did not seem to reduce acute toxicity after radiotherapy with a stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment schedule in localized prostate cancer. The introduction of real-time comprehensive motion management with prostate gating could further lower GU and GI toxicity and ameliorate treatment related quality of life.

Keywords

Journal Article

Citation

Lalmahomed, T A, Willigenburg, T, van de Pol, S M G, de Groot-van Breugel, E N, Snoeren, L M W, Hes, J, van Melick, H H E, Verkooijen, H M, de Boer, J C J & van der Voort van Zyp, J R N 2025, 'Acute toxicity and quality of life after margin reduction using a sub-fractionation workflow for stereotactic radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer on a 1.5 Tesla MR-linac', Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, vol. 207, 110845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110845