Carbon budgets and energy transition pathways

Publication date

2016-07-14

Authors

van Vuuren, Detlef P.ORCID 0000-0003-0398-2831ISNI 0000000040910093
Van Soest, Heleen
Riahi, Keywan
Clarke, Leon
Krey, Volker
Kriegler, Elmar
Rogelj, Joeri
Schaeffer, MichielORCID 0000-0003-0052-5088ISNI 0000000392561616
Tavoni, Massimo

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Scenarios from integrated assessment models can provide insights into how carbon budgets relate to other policy-relevant indicators by including information on how fast and by how much emissions can be reduced. Such indicators include the peak year of global emissions, the decarbonisation rate and the deployment of low-carbon technology. Here, we show typical values for these indicators for different carbon budgets, using the recently compiled IPCC scenario database, and discuss how these vary as a function of non-CO2 forcing, energy use and policy delay. For carbon budgets of 2000 GtCO2 and less over the 2010-2100 period, supply of low carbon technologies needs to be scaled up massively from today's levels, unless energy use is relatively low. For the subgroup of scenarios with a budget below 1000 GtCO2 (consistent with >66% chance of limiting global warming to below 2 °C relative to preindustrial levels), the 2050 contribution of low-carbon technologies is generally around 50%-75%, compared to less than 20% today (range refers to the 10-90th interval of available data).

Keywords

Carbon budget, climate policy, integrated assessment, mitigation strategy, General Environmental Science, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy, SDG 13 - Climate Action

Citation

Van Vuuren, D P, Van Soest, H, Riahi, K, Clarke, L, Krey, V, Kriegler, E, Rogelj, J, Schaeffer, M & Tavoni, M 2016, 'Carbon budgets and energy transition pathways', Environmental Research Letters, vol. 11, no. 7, 075002, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/075002