Patients’ perspectives on quality of life after burn

Publication date

2017

Authors

Kool, M.B.ISNI 0000000394052807
Geenen, R.ORCID 0000-0002-6615-6708ISNI 0000000397139908
Egberts, Marthe RianneISNI 0000000492496858
Wanders, H.
Van Loey, N.E.E.

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Background The concept quality of life (QOL) refers to both health-related outcomes and one’s skills to reach these outcomes, which is not yet incorporated in the burn-related QOL conceptualisation. The aim of this study was to obtain a comprehensive overview of relevant burn-specific domains of QOL from the patient’s perspective and to determine its hierarchical structure. Methods Concept mapping was used comprising a focus group (n = 6), interviews (n = 25), and a card-sorting task (n = 24) in burn survivors. Participants sorted aspects of QOL based on content similarity after which hierarchical cluster analysis was used to determine the hierarchical structure of burn-related QOL. Results Ninety-nine aspects of burn-related QOL were selected from the interviews, written on cards, and sorted. The hierarchical structure of burn-related QOL showed a core distinction between resilience and vulnerability. Resilience comprised the domains positive coping and social sharing. Vulnerability included 5 domains subdivided in 13 subdomains: the psychological domain included trauma-related symptoms, cognitive symptoms, negative emotions, body perception and depressive mood; the economical domain comprised finance and work; the social domain included stigmatisation/invalidation; the physical domain comprised somatic symptoms, scars, and functional limitations; and the intimate/sexual domain comprised the relationship with partner, and anxiety/avoidance in sexual life. Conclusion From the patient’s perspective, QOL following burns includes a variety of vulnerability and resilience factors, which forms a fresh basis for the development of a screening instrument. Whereas some factors are well known, this study also revealed overlooked problem and resilience areas that could be considered in client-centred clinical practice in order to customize self-management support.

Keywords

Burns, QOL, Vulnerability, Resilience, Trauma, Patients’ perspective, Taverne

Citation

Kool, M B, Geenen, R, Egberts, M R, Wanders, H & Van Loey, N E E 2017, 'Patients’ perspectives on quality of life after burn', Burns, vol. 43, pp. 747-756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2016.11.016