Leprosy and the Colonial Gaze: Comparing the Dutch West and East Indies, 1750-1950

Publication date

2019

Authors

Snelders, Stephen
van Bergen, L.
Huisman, Frank GISNI 0000000081163186

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc

Abstract

This article is looking at colonial governance with regard to leprosy, comparing two settings of the Dutch colonial empire: Suriname and the Dutch East Indies. Whereas segregation became formal policy in Suriname, leprosy sufferers were hardly ever segregated in the Dutch East Indies. We argue that the perceived needs to maintain a healthy labour force and to prevent contamination of white populations were the driving forces behind the difference in response to the disease. Wherever close contact between European planters and a non-European labour force existed together with conditions of forced servitude (either slavery or indentured labour), the Dutch response was to link leprosy to racial inferiority in order to legitimise compulsory segregation. This mainly happened in Suriname. We would like to suggest that forced labour, leprosy and compulsory segregation were connected through the ‘colonial gaze’, legitimising compulsory segregation of leprosy sufferers who had become useless to the plantation economy.

Keywords

Dutch colonial empire, colonial gaze, compulsory segregation, labour management, leprosy, othering, plantation economy

Citation

Snelders, S, van Bergen, L & Huisman, F G 2019, 'Leprosy and the Colonial Gaze: Comparing the Dutch West and East Indies, 1750-1950', Social History of Medicine, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 611-631. https://doi.org/10.1093/shm/hkz079