Forests, savannas and grasslands: bridging the knowledge gap between ecology and Dynamic Global Vegetation Models

Publication date

2014-06-01

Authors

Baudena, M.ORCID 0000-0002-6873-6466ISNI 0000000419499999
Dekker, S.C.ORCID 0000-0001-7764-2464ISNI 0000000397042727
van Bodegom, P. M.
Cuesta, B.
Higgins, S. I.
Lehsten, V.
Reick, C. H.
Rietkerk, MaxORCID 0000-0002-2698-3848ISNI 0000000047385244
Scheiter, S.
Yin, Z.ISNI 0000000507894606

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

The forest, savanna, and grassland biomes, and the transitions between them, are expected to undergo major changes in the future, due to global climate change. Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs) are very useful to understand vegetation dynamics under present climate, and to predict its changes under future conditions. However, several DGVMs display high uncertainty in predicting vegetation in tropical areas. Here we perform a comparative analysis of three different DGVMs (JSBACH, LPJ-GUESS-SPITFIRE and aDGVM) with regard to their representation of the ecological mechanisms and feedbacks that determine the forest, savanna and grassland biomes, in an attempt to bridge the knowledge gap between ecology and global modelling. Model outcomes, obtained including different mechanisms, are compared to observed tree cover along a mean annual precipitation gradient in Africa. Through these comparisons, and by drawing on the large number of recent studies that have delivered new insights into the ecology of tropical ecosystems in general, and of savannas in particular, we identify two main mechanisms that need an improved representation in the DGVMs. The first mechanism includes water limitation to tree growth, and tree-grass competition for water, which are key factors in determining savanna presence in arid and semi-arid areas. The second is a grass-fire feedback, which maintains both forest and savanna occurrences in mesic areas. Grasses constitute the majority of the fuel load, and at the same time benefit from the openness of the landscape after fires, since they recover faster than trees. Additionally, these two mechanisms are better represented when the models also include tree life stages (adults and seedlings), and distinguish between fire-prone and shade-tolerant savanna trees, and fire-resistant and shade-intolerant forest trees. Including these basic elements could improve the predictive ability of the DGVMs, not only under current climate conditions but also and especially under future scenarios.

Keywords

SDG 13 - Climate Action

Citation

Baudena, M, Dekker, S C, van Bodegom, P M, Cuesta, B, Higgins, S I, Lehsten, V, Reick, C H, Rietkerk, M, Scheiter, S, Yin, Z, Zavala, M A & Brovkin, V 2014, 'Forests, savannas and grasslands: bridging the knowledge gap between ecology and Dynamic Global Vegetation Models', Biogeosciences Discussions, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 9471-9510. https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-11-9471-2014