The Impact of a Standardized Pre-visit Laboratory Testing Panel in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic: a Controlled "On-Off" Trial

Publication date

2021-07

Authors

Vrijsen, B E LORCID 0000-0002-4676-3199
Ten Berg, Maarten JISNI 0000000397111585
Naaktgeboren, Christiana A.
Vis, Jolande Y.
Dijstelbloem, H.ISNI 0000000389079132
Westerink, J.ISNI 0000000388385904
Dekker, DouweISNI 0000000396416926
Höfer, ImoISNI 0000000393149164
Haitjema, SaskiaORCID 0000-0001-5465-4868
Hulsbergen-Veelken, Cornelia

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Background: In several settings, a shorter time to diagnosis has been shown to lead to improved clinical outcomes. The implementation of a rapid laboratory testing allows for a pre-visit testing in the outpatient clinic, meaning that test results are available during the first outpatient visit. Objective: To determine whether the pre-visit laboratory testing leads to a shorter time to diagnosis in the general internal medicine outpatient clinic. Design: An “on-off” trial, allocating subjects to one of two treatment arms in consecutive alternating blocks. Participants: All new referrals to the internal medicine outpatient clinic of a university hospital were included, excluding second opinions. A total of 595 patients were eligible; one person declined to participate, leaving data from 594 patients for analysis. Intervention: In the intervention group, patients had a standardized pre-visit laboratory testing before the first visit. Main Measures: The primary outcome was the time to diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were the correctness of the preliminary diagnosis on the first day, health care utilization, and patient and physician satisfaction. Key Results: There was no difference in time to diagnosis between the two groups (median 35 days vs 35 days; hazard ratio 1.03 [0.87–1.22]; p =.71). The pre-visit testing group had higher proportions of both correct preliminary diagnoses on day 1 (24% vs 14%; p =.003) and diagnostic workups being completed on day 1 (10% vs 3%; p <.001). The intervention group had more laboratory tests done (50.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 39.0–69.0] vs 43.0 [IQR 31.0–68.5]; p <.001). Otherwise, there were no differences between the groups. Conclusions: Pre-visit testing did not lead to a shorter overall time to diagnosis. However, a greater proportion of patients had a correct diagnosis on the first day. Further studies should focus on customizing pre-visit laboratory panels, to improve their efficacy. Trial Registration: NL5009

Keywords

ambulatory care, clinical chemistry tests, diagnosis, Internal Medicine, Journal Article

Citation

Vrijsen, B E L, Ten Berg, M J, Naaktgeboren, C A, Vis, J Y, Dijstelbloem, H M, Westerink, J, Dekker, D, Hoefer, I E, Haitjema, S, Hulsbergen-Veelken, C A R, van Solinge, W W & Kaasjager, H A H 2021, 'The Impact of a Standardized Pre-visit Laboratory Testing Panel in the Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinic : a Controlled "On-Off" Trial', Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1914-1920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06453-2