Crossover restrictions, A-bar pronouns and discourse antecedents
Publication date
2015
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
The difference between weak crossovers and weakest crossovers is usually derived from a distinction between quantifiers and non-quantifiers (Lasnik & Stowell 1991). In this paper I will derive crossover restrictions from a new example set, long movement constructions with Dutch A-bar pronouns. Besides question wh-pronouns and relative pronouns, the set of Dutch A-bar pronouns includes topic d-pronouns not available in English. I will argue that A-bar pronouns constitute a uniform set of quantifiers, be it quantifiers with a discourse antecedent. To explain the present analysis, I take the proposals of Safir (2004) and Ruys (2004) as a starting point. A major difference between these approaches and my own is that my analysis will make a distinction between strong crossovers on the one hand versus weak and weakest crossovers on the other hand, whereas it is more usual to see a related explanation for strong and weak crossovers versus weakest crossovers.
Keywords
crossover restrictions, coreference, binding, dependency, A-bar pronouns, topic d-pronoun, discourse antecedent
Citation
van Kampen, N J 2015, 'Crossover restrictions, A-bar pronouns and discourse antecedents', Linguistics in the Netherlands, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 88 –104 . https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.32.07kam