Clinical implications of airway obstruction with normal or low FEV 1 in childhood and adolescence

Publication date

2024-06-01

Authors

Koefoed, Hans Jacob Lohne
Wang, Gang
Gehring, Ulrike
Ekstrom, Sandra
Kull, Inger
Vermeulen, RoelORCID 0000-0003-4082-8163
Boer, Jolanda M.A.
Bergstrom, Anna
Koppelman, Gerard H.
Melén, Erik

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc

Abstract

Background Airway obstruction is defined by spirometry as a low forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1) to forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio. This impaired ratio may originate from a low FEV 1 (classic) or a normal FEV 1 in combination with a large FVC (dysanaptic). The clinical implications of dysanaptic obstruction during childhood and adolescence in the general population remain unclear. Aims To investigate the association between airway obstruction with a low or normal FEV 1 in childhood and adolescence, and asthma, wheezing and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). Methods In the BAMSE (Barn/Child, Allergy, Milieu, Stockholm, Epidemiology; Sweden) and PIAMA (Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy; the Netherlands) birth cohorts, obstruction (FEV 1:FVC ratio less than the lower limit of normal, LLN) at ages 8, 12 (PIAMA only) or 16 years was classified as classic (FEV 1 <LLN) or dysanaptic (FEV 1 ≥LLN) obstruction. Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between these two types of obstruction and respiratory health outcomes were estimated by cohort-adjusted logistic regression on pooled data. Results The prevalence of classic obstruction at ages 8, 12 and 16 in the two cohorts was 1.5%, 1.1% and 1.5%, respectively. Dysanaptic obstruction was slightly more prevalent: 3.9%, 2.5% and 4.6%, respectively. Obstruction, regardless of FEV 1, was consistently associated with higher odds of asthma (dysanaptic obstruction: OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.40 to 3.74), wheezing, asthma medication use and BHR compared with the normal lung function group. Approximately one-third of the subjects with dysanaptic obstruction in childhood remained dysanaptic during adolescence. Clinical implications Children and adolescents with airway obstruction had, regardless of their FEV 1 level, a higher prevalence of asthma and wheezing. Follow-up and treatment at these ages should be guided by the presence of airway obstruction.

Keywords

Asthma, Asthma Epidemiology, Asthma Guidelines, Clinical Epidemiology, Lung Physiology, Paediatric asthma, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Citation

Koefoed, H J L, Wang, G, Gehring, U, Ekstrom, S, Kull, I, Vermeulen, R, Boer, J M A, Bergstrom, A, Koppelman, G H, Melén, E, Vonk, J M & Hallberg, J 2024, 'Clinical implications of airway obstruction with normal or low FEV 1 in childhood and adolescence', Thorax, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 573-580. https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2023-220952