The Rule of Law from Below – A Concept Under Development

Publication date

2021

Authors

Buyse, A.C.ISNI 0000000114926996
Fortin, K.M.A.ISNI 000000039714204X
Leyh, Brianne Mc GonigleORCID 0000-0002-0865-2340ISNI 0000000365711017
Fraser, J.A.ORCID 0000-0001-8936-0915ISNI 0000000418605526

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Editorial
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

The rule of law is a central notion in legal thought and in the practice of democratic states. While a contested term, scholars have articulated its contours - both formal and substantive. This includes ideas such as legal certainty, prospectivity, access to justice, and the fact that everyone should be accountable under the law. Much of the scholarship has centred on states and international organisations as the primary entities responsible for protecting the rule of law. By contrast, the relationship between individuals and groups of people in civil society vis-à-vis the rule of law is under-explored in (international) law. This special issue is therefore dedicated to elaborating upon this relationship - the ‘rule of law from below.‘ This Introduction sets out the concept and illustrates it with examples of the innovative ways that people are using in practice to support the rule of law from below. While noting that the concept of ‘rule of law from below’ is one under development, we argue that there is much value in investigating instances where actors beyond formal state institutions, who have no constitutional or other formal legal role, take it upon themselves to uphold and defend the rule of law. This is especially important in today's global context of shifts in power between state and non-state actors, as well as pervasive democratic and rule-of-law backsliding.

Keywords

civil society, human rights, legal concepts, rule of law from below, Law, SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Citation

Buyse, A, Fortin, K, Mc Gonigle, B & Fraser, J 2021, 'The Rule of Law from Below – A Concept Under Development', Utrecht Law Review, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.36633/ulr.771