Is there any difference in Amide and NOE CEST effects between white and gray matter at 7T?

Publication date

2016-09-16

Authors

Khlebnikov, Vitaly
Siero, J. C.W.ORCID 0000-0001-5079-2868ISNI 0000000394978810
Wijnen, JannieORCID 0000-0003-2352-3667ISNI 0000000387155509
Visser, Fredy
Luijten, Peter R.ORCID 0000-0002-8040-8449ISNI 0000000397136870
Klomp, Dennis W.J.ORCID 0000-0002-5884-5386ISNI 0000000396514008
Hoogduin, HansORCID 0000-0001-7707-0750ISNI 0000000389154198

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Letter

Collections

Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Measurement of Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) is providing tissue physiology dependent contrast, e.g. by looking at Amide and NOE (Nuclear Overhauser Enhancement) effects. CEST is unique in providing quantitative metabolite information at high imaging resolution. However, direct comparison of Amide and NOE effects between different tissues may result in wrong conclusions on the metabolite concentration due to the additional contributors to the observed CEST contrast, such as water content (WC) and water T1 relaxation (T1w). For instance, there are multiple contradictory reports in the literature on Amide and NOE effects in white matter (WM) and gray matter (GM) at 7T. This study shows that at 7T, tissue water T1 relaxation is a stronger contributor to CEST contrasts than WC. After water T1 correction, there was no difference in Amide effects between WM and GM, whereas WM/GM contrast was enhanced for NOE effects.

Keywords

CEST, Amide, NOE, Water T1 correction, CEST contrast origin, White matter, Gray matter, Water content, Taverne, Journal Article

Citation

Khlebnikov, V, Siero, JCW, Wijnen, J, Visser, F, Luijten, P R, Klomp, DWJ & Hoogduin, H 2016, 'Is there any difference in Amide and NOE CEST effects between white and gray matter at 7T?', Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 272, pp. 82-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2016.09.010