Sex differences in trust and trustworthiness: A meta-analysis of the trust game and the gift-exchange game
Publication date
2020-12-01
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
We present a meta-analytic review of the literature on sex differences in the trust game (174 effect sizes) and the related gift-exchange game (35 effect sizes). Based on parental investment theory and social role theory we expected men to be more trusting and women to be more trustworthy. Indeed, men were more trusting in the trust game (g = 0.22), yet we found no significant sex difference in trust in the gift-exchange game (g = 0.15). Regarding trustworthiness, we found no significant sex difference in the trust game (g = −0.04), and we found men, not women, to be more trustworthy in the gift-exchange game (g = 0.33). These results suggest that men send more money than women do when their money is going to be multiplied, thereby creating an efficiency gain. This so-called “male multiplier effect” may be explained by a stronger psychological tendency in men to acquire resources.
Keywords
Gift-exchange game, Meta-analysis, Reciprocity, Sex differences, Trust, Trust game, Trustworthiness, Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics
Citation
van den Akker, O R, van Assen, M A L M, van Vugt, M & Wicherts, J M 2020, 'Sex differences in trust and trustworthiness : A meta-analysis of the trust game and the gift-exchange game', Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 81, 102329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2020.102329