Rechtspleging in jeugdbeschermingszaken tijdens de coronacrisis: Een verslag van lopend onderzoek
Publication date
2021-10-01
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
This contribution reports on an ongoing study into the impact of the COVID pandemic on the rights of vulnerable litigants in the handling of court cases concerning supervision orders and custodial placements of juveniles. The research is based on interviews with judges, lawyers and other professionals in the youth protection chain and a survey among litigants. The central question is whether the handling of these cases should be considered acceptable from the perspective of procedural and fundamental rights. In addition, the procedural justice experienced by litigants is examined. The preliminary results, based on desk research and interviews, is that of varyingly successful improvisations with telephone and digital hearings, in which procedural and fundamental rights could not be fully realized. This is mainly due to technical problems and the complexity of judicial case management under these circumstances. The interviewees differed about whether the bottom of what is acceptable was reached and how often this was the case. The final report will take stock of this and draw lessons for the future.
Keywords
administration of justice, JUVENILE JUSTICE, covid-19, remote justice, Taverne, SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Citation
Bauw, E, Glasgow, Y, Janssen, A & Simon Thomas, M 2021, 'Rechtspleging in jeugdbeschermingszaken tijdens de coronacrisis: Een verslag van lopend onderzoek', Justitiële Verkenningen, vol. 47, no. 3, 5, pp. 93-105. https://doi.org/10.5553/JV/016758502021047003006