Applying complementarity in ecological restoration

Publication date

2025-11

Authors

Verschoor, Mink RORCID 0009-0008-4016-4663
Hautier, YannORCID 0000-0003-4347-7741ISNI 0000000351202609
Kowalchuk, G.A.ISNI 0000000395768233
Temmink, Ralph J.M.ORCID 0000-0001-9467-9875ISNI 000000050744973X
van Kuijk, MarijkeISNI 0000000392799691
Ladouceur, Emma R
Wright, Alexandra J
Barry, Kathryn E.ORCID 0000-0001-6893-6479ISNI 0000000506321398

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc

Abstract

Climate change and biodiversity loss decrease ecosystem functioning and compromise the delivery of nature's contributions to people. Restoration may help address these global challenges, but systems are unique and goals diverse. We review how translating complementarity theory into restoration practice in terrestrial, coastal, and wetland ecosystems can help to meet functional restoration goals. Using the mechanisms that drive complementarity - resource partitioning, abiotic facilitation, and biotic feedbacks - can improve restoration outcomes. These mechanisms can increase functioning by guiding site preparation and species selection, enhancing establishment, and limiting dominant species. We propose a decision tool to match mechanisms with suitable contexts. Degraded ecosystems offer unique opportunities to intentionally reintroduce these processes and observe how they rebuild complexity and function.

Keywords

abiotic facilitation, biotic feedbacks, ecosystem functioning, ecosystem restoration, resource partitioning, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, SDG 13 - Climate Action, SDG 15 - Life on Land

Citation

Verschoor, M R, Hautier, Y, Kowalchuk, G A, Temmink, R J M, van Kuijk, M, Ladouceur, E R, Wright, A J & Barry, K E 2025, 'Applying complementarity in ecological restoration', Trends in ecology & evolution, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1077-1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2025.08.007